To do Lenovo desktop factory reset in Windows 10/8/7, you need to go and find. Reading the user guide I have learned about the recovery partition and the possibility of creating recovery media to use instead if I chose to delete the recovery partition (which I am. I would however like to be able to reset to factory settings with the Windows installation. The exonerated play pdf on dvd. Lenovo X230 Recovery Disc Download.
Lenovo X230 Recovery Disc Windows 8 In DualBut I am not able to access it. I have already windows 7 pro preinstalled with lenovo recovery partition. But now when I start my comp, it shows BOOTMGR missing. 0 Comments I was trying to install windows 8 in dual boot mode. FreeBSD and custom firmware on the Google PixelbookLenovo X230 Recovery Disc Download. A powerful utility that was designed in order to provide you with a simple means of backing up your system.With Lenovo OneKey Recovery you can easily create a recovery disc and use it to restore a partition anytime you need.with a HiDPI display (and ideally with a good size for exact 2x scaling instead of fractional) with a 3:2 display (why is Lenovo making these Serious Work™ laptops 16:9 in the first place? 16:9 is awful in below-13-inch sizes especially) lighter and thinner (ha, turns out this is actually important, I got tired of carrying a T H I C C laptop - Apple was right all along) But this summer I’ve decided that it was time for something newer. Unlike most people in the ThinkPad crowd, I actually liked the clickpad and didn’t use the trackpoint much.how about something with open source firmware, that would be fun.I was considering a ThinkPad X1 Carbon from an old generation - the one from the same year as the X230 is corebootable, so that’s fun. supported by FreeBSD of course (“some development required” is okay but I’m not going to write big drivers) assembled with screws and not glue (I don’t necessarily need expansion and stuff in a laptop all that much, but being able to replace the battery without dealing with a glued chassis is good) Mac windows or chromebook whats right for meThe new AMD x86-64 architecture, of which the specifications were published at the end of 2000, with hardware to follow in 2002, is used as an example.Supporting multiple platforms was a primary goal of the NetBSD project from the start. This paper takes a look at what has been done to make it portable, and how this has decreased the amount of effort needed to port NetBSD to a new architecture. Something rather big for a tablet, but it is useful actually), a Wacom touchscreen that supports a pen, mostly reasonable hardware (Intel Wi-Fi), and that famous coreboot support (Chromebooks’ stock firmware is coreboot + depthcharge).So here it is, my new laptop, a Google Pixelbook.Seriously, I have no big words to say, other than just recommending this laptop to FOSS enthusiasts :)Porting NetBSD to the AMD x86-64: a case study in OS portabilityNetBSD is known as a very portable operating system, currently running on 44 different architectures (12 different types of CPU). Thin aluminum design, a 3:2 HiDPI screen, rubber palm rests (why isn’t every laptop ever doing that?!), the “convertibleness” (flip the screen around to turn it into. Other than the big huge large bezels around the screen, I liked everything about it. I want something more efficient, not less!And then I discovered the Pixelbook. Assumptions made about type sizes on 32-bit platforms were a large problem when 64-bit platforms came around. When writing code that is intended to be machine-independent, and it contains conditional preprocessor statements depending on the architecture, then the code is likely wrong, or an extra abstraction layer is needed to get rid of these statements.Assumptions about the size of any type are not made. If so, it is machine-independent and put it in an appropriate place in the source tree. In NetBSD, it should always be considered if the code can be assumed to be useful on other architectures, present or future. Proposal: Can we have a property like quota-policy=strict or loose, where we can optionally allow ZFS to run over the quota as long as performance is not decreased.This is very interesting to me because of two reasons. Problem: As you approach quotas, ZFS performance degrades. Relax quota semantics for improved performance (Allan Jude) In the September meeting notes, I read a very interesting (to me) agenda item: Announcements and meeting notes from these meetings get sent out to various mailing lists, including the ZFS on Linux ones. We have in the past assumed that this was relatively harmless and would only make people run out of space. Even better, it might someday be improved (and perhaps in a way that we can use at least some of the time).Second, any number of people here run very close to and sometimes at the quota limits of both filesystems and pools, fundamentally because people aren't willing to buy more space. It's nice to know that this wasn't just our imagination and that there is a real issue here. We've had issues before with somewhat subtle slowdowns that we didn't understand (cf), so I can't discount that we're having it happen again.Fixing up KA9Q-unix, or "neck deep in 30 year old codebases."I'll preface this by saying - yes, I'm still neck deep in FreeBSD's wifi stack and 802.11ac support, but it turns out it's slow work to fix 15 year old locking related issues that worked fine on 11abg cards, kinda worked ok on 11n cards, and are terrible for these 11ac cards. Another possible reason is that we haven't been looking closely enough to see that we're experiencing global slowdowns that correlate to filesystems hitting quota limits. One possible reason for this is that having lots of RAM and SSDs makes the effects mostly go away. (It's apparently similar to what happens when the pool is almost full, but I don't know the specifics of that either.)With that said, we don't seem to have seen clear adverse effects on our Linux fileservers, and they've definitely run into quota limits (repeatedly). The first step will have to be learning the details of what's going on at the ZFS level to cause the slowdown. But, now I do, and I've done a bunch of other stuff with a bunch of other radios. I didn't have my amateur radio licence. Well, until a few years ago really. I've been wanting to do this since I was a teenager and found out about its existence, but back in high school and. This means operations are generally atomic and can survive a power outage, etc. Kinda.HAMMER2 is Copy on Write, meaning changes are made to copies of existing data. And amazingly, his local node ran on FreeBSD! It turns out Jeremy (KK6JJJ) ported both an old copy of KA9Q and N0ARY-BBS to run on FreeBSD! Cool!I grabbed my 2m radio (which is already cabled up for digital modes), compiled up his KA9Q port, figured out how to get it to speak to Direwolf, and. I'm 40 now, leave me be.But! A few weeks ago I found that someone was still running a packet BBS out of San Francisco. The main stacks of choice these days run on Linux, Windows or are a full hardware TNC.So yes, I was avoiding hacking on AX.25 stuff because there wasn't a BSD compatible AX.25 stack. The commit messages explain the situation: CVSROOT: /cvsAdd ttyC4 to lost of devices to change when logging in on ttyC0 (and in some cases also the serial console) such that X can use it as its VT when running without root privileges.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJen ArchivesCategories |